Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today
Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
![]() |
- VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is original research WP:OR. There are no reliable sources that verify the term used in the article "VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine". Melbguy05 (talk) 07:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Studio Flad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for companies or studios. Kopnakolicti Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- JustiServ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the company is no longer active, and the article lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability. It primarily contains promotional content and does not meet Wikipedia’s guidelines for verifiability and significant coverage Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Vikas Kapoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was previous nominated and deleted. It was then recreated. However the issue still seems to be there. Cannot find independent significant coverage about the person himself to indicate he is anything more than a run-of-the-MILL CEO. Imcdc Contact 06:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Computing, India, and United States of America. Imcdc Contact 06:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Erinola E. Daranijo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Autobiography of a lesser-known journalist. Some sources are self-published, and there's very little indication of notability. Fails WP:NJOURNALIST. Author has also removed maintenance templates for no apparent reason. CycloneYoris talk! 05:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. CycloneYoris talk! 05:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Only here for self promotion. A draft Draft:Erinola E. Daranijo already exists. Agent 007 (talk)
- Meenal Choubey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mayors are not inherently notable under WP:NPOL. GrabUp - Talk 07:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Chhattisgarh. GrabUp - Talk 07:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep the guideline also mentions Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage - there are many news about her from google search.
- Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Uncle Bash007, can you atleast give 3 sources? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- ok @Reading Beans..
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4] Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:00, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Uncle Bash007, these are routine coverages about things that were said. What we look for are in-depth, independent coverage in multiple reliable sources and these doesn’t cut it. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Uncle Bash007, can you atleast give 3 sources? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per my comment. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 20:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Mayor of Raipur passes WP:GNG have added references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Pharaoh of the Wizards, how does the mayor of a city pass GNG? And I’m seeing press releases and speeches here. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 09:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5][6][7] [8] [9]
References
- ^ Bajpai, Shashank Shekhar (4 March 2025). "रायपुर महापौर मीनल चौबे ने संभाली कुर्सी, शहर के चहुंमुखी विकास का किया वादा". Nai Dunia (in Hindi). Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ^ Marut raj (28 March 2025). "रायपुर में 4 नए फ्लाई ओवर और कामकाजी महिलाओं के लिए 3 हॉस्टल बनेंगे". Sootr (in Hindi). Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ^ "RMC's 1.5k crore budget prioritises urban devpt". The Times of India. 29 March 2025. Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ^ Hitavada, The (6 February 2025). "BJP's Minal Choubey pledges to prioritise basic amenities". The Hitavada. Retrieved 1 April 2025.
- ^ "Raipur: जानें कौन हैं मीनल चौबे, जिसे बीजेपी ने रायपुर नगर निगम से मेयर प्रत्याशी के लिये चुनावी रण में उतारा". Amar Ujala (in Hindi). 27 January 2025. Retrieved 2 April 2025.
- ^ Mallick, Avdhesh (28 March 2025). "Raipur Mayor Meenal Chaubey Presents ₹1529.53 Crore RMC Budget, Focus On Women Empowerment & Infrastructure". Free Press Journal. Retrieved 2 April 2025.
- ^ Behera, Partha Sarathi (1 March 2025). "Develop public facilities based on citizen input: Raipur mayor Meenal Chaubey". The Times of India. Retrieved 2 April 2025.
- ^ "Raipur mayor's oath-taking sparks debate over religious slogans". cgkhabar.com. 28 February 2025. Retrieved 6 April 2025.
- ^ तिवारी, पवन (15 February 2025). "raipur news people choose us for development know what meenal choubey said after the victory". Navbharat Times (in Hindi). Retrieved 6 April 2025.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - she's the mayor of a city with a million people, not Schenectady. Bearian (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Big Population is common in India, that should not be compared with western cities. GrabUp - Talk 04:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Every Chinese mayor is entitled to an entry we follow this “one million population”. The subject clearly does not meet NPOL#1 and the sources presented as evident to everyone is not GNG-worthy. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – Meenal Chaubey is the currently serving Mayor of Raipur, which is the capital city of Chhattisgarh, India. Holding the mayoral office of a state capital is a position of significant political importance and public interest. Her election has been covered by multiple reliable and independent news sources such as The Times of India, NDTV, and Hindustan Times, which establish her notability under Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (GNG) and WP:POLITICIAN. Furthermore, her political career, public engagements, and influence on local governance are well-documented, making her a notable figure in Indian municipal politics. Deletion of such a page would remove verifiable and encyclopedic information about a currently elected public official.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesurajsahu (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ibrahim Al-Rabeeah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined prod. All sources are still just databases and insufficient for meeting WP:SPORTBASIC. LibStar (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Kuwait. LibStar (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, coverage found in Al Qabas, 6 August 1978 page 16: [5]. There is also coverage in Al Qabas 19 January 1985 edition page 10 though I am not sure if that one is a namesake. Subject was a 1976 Olympian from Kuwait where sourcing access is sparse, but I think that there's enough indication here to know that further coverage exists. --Habst (talk) 03:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- AMP (streamer collective) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
most of the notable stuff are about a member of the group, not the group itself. the only significant coverage about the group are from the tubefilter article, the rest are mainly about kai cenat. Http iosue (talk) 00:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Entertainment, Internet, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Men.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This porn site is not notable under any criteria. It is not covered by any news sources and hardly even mentioned by Aylo themselves. Most of this article is just Men.com releases video, generates controversy or fame. The article's citations are also generally unreliable and not independent of the subject. Most of the websites are gay porn sites or LGBT forums which are not reliable and the gay porn websites could have been paid for a biased review given Aylo's power.
Note: I tried to PROD the article but an IP editor contested it. Now that I am unblocked I will move it to AFD. DotesConks (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Film, Organizations, and Europe. DotesConks (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Sexuality and gender, and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Atul Tandon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only significant coverage I'm seeing does not appear to be independent. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and United States of America. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Gravitic density meter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD nomination was refused due to discussion on the talk page of the article. During my original WP:BEFORE of the article, the only source about this specific type of density meter were primary from the company MPV Tech, the same company that produced the brochure in the wiki article. This article fails to meet WP:NOTABILITY and appears to be WP:PROMOTION for a product that never gained widespread adoption.
Link to the talk page where Ldm1954 and I discussed his concerns about my nomination.
Summary of what I found during my original BEFORE and from my additional checks during the discussion on the article talk page:
- 253 total hits for "gravitic density meter" on google, of which google only showed 26 due to similarity. Of these, only two seem to be discussing the specific apparatus described in the wiki article: the linkedin page of the manufacturer (2 hits) and a forum post linking to the linkedin page
Remaining sources fall into several categories:
- Wikipedia pages (2)
- 2 pages to a manufacturer/seller of density meters in China (sunp-electric)
- those from unreliable sites like chegg or studocu which are also behind registration pages (I count 5 total)
- Youtube: 2 videos showing how to make a "gravitic density meter" both of which describe how to measure specific gravity and are not related apparatus described in the article. 2 more hits that mention gravitic density meter.
- 5 sources that just copy the text of the wikipedia article https://www.definitions.net/definition/gravitic][6][7][8][9]
- 4 that just seem to have the words "gravitic density meter" on the page somewhere
- 1 about an exploding cybertruck for some reason
Searching for various combinations of "gravitic" "density" and "meter" bring up numerous results about density meters but I have not found anything that describes the deflected-rubber-hose-for-slurries apparatus described in the article. However, this is a difficult search due to the similarity between the concepts of specific gravity and density which can be confused in translation so there still may be sources that demonstrate notability out there. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This term doesn't appear in Gsholar or Jstor, you get scattered hits in Gbooks [10] or [11] about density measurement. This almost appears to be a hoax. Oaktree b (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral. I have no skin in the game here. I raised questions on the talk page; if I had objected strongly to the PROD I would have just removed it. Liz decided that the talk page was enough that AfD was more appropriate. I read the page, and I think the device would work. Of course there will be nothing on Gscholar or Jstor, nobody would write a science article on this! Even though I have spent most of my life writing science papers, those are not the only sources for notable devices.Ldm1954 (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's clearly non-notable. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:45, 10 April 2025 (UTC)